Personal statement and testimony, intended to be
given to the ACLU
Statement
of _James F. Lico, a
Non-consensual Human Subject who resides in _Everett, Washington_ to
“Opt-Out” or Discontinue Participation in the Human Subject Research/Experiment
Introduction:
In the
Bioethics Commission’s report released on December 15, 2011, the Bioethics
Commission suggested that to keep track of the more than 55,000 research
projects using human subjects, the Federal government should create a central
online portal and database where basic information about the projects are
archived and made easily accessible and further concluded that it “cannot say
that all federally funded research provides optimal protections against
avoidable harms and unethical treatment”. The Bioethics Commission also said
although human subjects in US government-funded research are generally
protected by existing rules and regulations, their safety and well-being could
be enhanced with stronger measures, including increased public transparency and
a system of compensating subjects who sustain research-related injuries.
Research is defined by the Common Rule regulations
as “a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and
evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Activities
which meet this definition constitute research for purposes of this policy,
whether or not they are conducted or supported under a program which is
considered research for other purposes. For example, some demonstration and
service programs may include research activities.” Medical experiment is defined by California Law, Health
& Safety Code Section 24171 as “the severance or penetration or damaging of
tissues of a human subject or the use of a drug or device, electromagnetic
radiation, heat or cold, or a biological substance or organism, in or upon a
human subject in the practice of research of medicine in a manner not
reasonably related to maintaining or improving the health of the subject or
otherwise directly benefiting the subject.
Human
Subject is
defined by the Common Rule regulations as “a living individual about whom an
investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains
either a) data through intervention or interaction with the individual or b)
identifiable private
information.” Human
subject is
defined by FDA regulations as “an individual who is or becomes a participant in
research, either as a recipient of the test article or as a control. A subject
may be either a healthy human or a patient. Subject [also] means a human who
participates in an investigation, either as an individual on whom or on whose
specimen an in//vestigational device is used or as a control.”
Human
subject research should adhere to the ethical principles and guidelines for the
protection of human research participants summarized in the uniform set of
regulations, called the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, 45
CFR 46, Subpart A, formally known as the “Common Rule.” The 45 CFR 46
regulations are based in large part on the Belmont Report and were written to
offer basic protections to human subjects involved in both biomedical and
behavioral research. Today, 45 CFR 46, Subjects A and E: Registration of
Institutional Review Boards (added 1/15/2009) is shared by 17 Departments and
Agencies, representing most, but not all, of the Federal Departments and
Agencies sponsoring human subjects research. Many of them have not adopted
Subpart B: Additional Protections for Pregnant Women, Human Fetuses &
Neonates Involved in Research, Subpart C: Additional Protections Pertaining to
Biomedical & Behavior Research Involving Prisoners as Subjects, or Subject
D: Additional Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research. For
the past 20 years, 45 CFR 46, have been considered merely “guidelines” and is
not a lawfully, promulgated regulation.
Before
a research project involving human subjects is initiated, it must be reviewed
and approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB has a
central role in ensuring that all human subject research is planned and
conducted in an ethical manner, and in compliance with federal, state and local
regulations. The major responsibilities of the IRB are to assess the risks and
benefits of proposed research and to promote respect for its advice and counsel
in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects.
Statement of _James F. Lico, a
Non-consensual Human Subject who resides in _ Everett, Washington _to
“Opt-Out” or Discontinue Participation in the Human Subject Research/Experiment
Request
to “Opt-Out” or Discontinue Participation as a “Non-consensual” Human Subject
Section
I.**Include a couple of lines about your background and a short introduction
about yourself.***
I, _James F. Lico _ believe
I may have been randomly selected as a participant, or human subject, in a
research/experiment without my voluntary, informed consent, either orally or
written and without my knowledge. I
met the definition of being a human subject in a research/medical
experiment.
I am
being tracked, tortured, monitored, & targeted with information &
communications technology by my fellow American citizens.
______________________________________________________________________________________
My name is James Francis Lico and I will be 61
years old on November 5th. DOB=11/05/1951 and SSN=262-044-9621. I have a bachelor degree in
computer science and two associate degrees, one in electronics engineering
technology and one in biology. I have
narcolepsy, hypertension, arthritis and obstructive sleep apnea.
I am constant electronic surveillance with chemical and electromagnetic attack. I am a member of a group of people in America
known as "Targeted Individuals", all with identical symptoms.
I
was originally targeted with torture/kill technology while I was living in Cape
Coral FL in 2010. However I may have
been under surveillance before that. I
worked at the School District of Lee County FL from 1998 until 2010 as Application
Support Specialist for 11 years. I had
been gang stalked at work when I was laid off one day before I was to go on a
two week vacation. I filed a complaint
with the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) for age discrimination
and disability discrimination. I am
waiting to hear back about that.
I
was chased out of my house and took the first good offer to sell. I was attacked viciously while in FL and so I
decided to move. I first moved to High
Springs FL, but was financially taken advantage of and then falsely arrested
and placed in Jail for 45 days. The
woman said she owned the house but in fact it was owned by her psychiatrist as
I later found out through county tax records.
Even though I had the bail, I was allowed to stay in jail the entire
time. I lost all of my belongings,
except for some guns that were confiscated by the police. The police have not been helpful and
seemingly assisted the woman who defrauded me.
I lost $15,000 plus all of my belongings valued at $75,000. My record remains clean. Even though the Police said I must come to
them due to the no contact order, they refuse to even call this woman to verify
whether or not my belongings are at her residence and will not let me file
charges against her for Elder abuse. They
tell me it is a civil matter and I know the first question the defense will
have is why I didn’t file charges against this woman. They know I can’t afford to go to civil trial,
so she will get to keep her ill-gotten gains thanks to the High Springs Police
Department. She filed a false police
report and they don’t even want to ask the question why she lied about owning
the house, which was their reason for arresting me. It is suspected by many TI’s that numerous psychiatrists
have active interests and participation in the targeting of American Citizens.
I decided to move to Washington State to get a
job, because there were more jobs available in the technology field. Leaving the Lee County area did no good and I
was to find that no matter where I went in the country, I would be followed and
receive the same torture/kill treatment.
I have gone completely through my life savings quickly because I have
been on the run from the horrible program or experimentation I am controlled
by.
I
had to apply for food and living assistance in July because the State of
Florida Employment Security Division had put me under investigation for 6
months they would not pay me unemployment insurance they owed me. They were embarrassed into it because I was
on assistance in another state and they had no excuse for investigating me. Inability to obtain a job is not a crime. I have had interview, yet no job has come
from it. TI’s are under perpetual
investigation with potential employers informed that I am a terrorist
suspect. It will be a miracle if I can
obtain another job at this point.
I
have 3 RFID microchip implants as verified by Jessie Beltran in Sacramento CA
and Seattle WA. I have one each in
right/left upper temporal area and one in left shoulder. Please see you tube video.
______________________________________________________________________________________
In the
National Institutes of Health, Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR)
1993 Institutional Review Board Guidebook states, “attention
should be paid to subjects' rights when they decide to withdraw from
participation in the study. The federal regulations clearly require that
subjects be free to withdraw from participation without penalty or loss of
benefits to which they are otherwise entitled [Federal Policy §116(a) (8)].”
In
addition, the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects believed
that those who are already burdened (e.g.,
by disabilities or institutionalization) should not be asked to accept the
burdens of research unless other appropriate subjects cannot be found (i.e., if the research
concerns their particular disability or circumstance).
This
human subject research/experiment has failed to comply with the terms in Title
45 Public Welfare Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46). This part
of the “Common Rule” is intended to allow IRBs to waive informed consent in its
entirety or any of the required elements of informed consent. In order
for this human subject/experiment to waive informed consent it had to meet the
4 criteria in 45 CFR 46.116 (d). An IRB may approve a consent procedure which
does not include, or which alters, some or all of the elements of informed
consent set forth in this section, or waive the requirements to obtain informed
consent provided the IRB finds and documents that: (1)The research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects; (2) The
waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the
subjects; (3) The research could not practicably be
carried out without the waiver or alteration; and (4) Whenever
appropriate, the subjects will be provided with additional pertinent
information after participation.
Risk is
defined in The IRB Guidebook as the probability of harm or injury (physical,
psychological, social, or economic) occurring as a result of participation in a
research study. Both the probability and magnitude of possible harm may
vary from minimal to significant.
Federal regulations define only "minimal risk." Minimal
risk is defined
in the Common Rule as the probability and magnitude of physical or
psychological harm that is normally encountered in the daily lives, or in the
routine medical, dental, or psychological examination of healthy persons.
II.**
Revise and discuss your pain, violations of your rights, privacy, safety &
welfare as a human subject. **
The
human research practices, presents a danger to my overall well-being and has
violated my rights and welfare as a
human subject. which I am experiencing, should be reclassified as “cruel
and unusual punishment” or “crimes against humanity”, which goes way beyond the
physical or psychological harm that is “normally” encountered in our daily
lives or in the routine medical, dental, or psychological examination. I am
experiencing intentional infliction of severe physical pain or suffering, which
violates my rights and falls under the purview of 18 USC § 2340 Torture.______________________________
I am under constant 24/7 electronic surveillance
with directed energy weapons, chemical attacks, electronic and chemical
harassment, as well as being followed by car and on foot by organized
stalkers. I feel stings all over my
body, especially my eyes, head, shoulders and genital areas. I am microwaved sometimes from more than one
source, with the handler eliciting outside perpetrators to use portable
microwave weapons on me. The microwaving
makes my skin burn and my heart has to work a lot harder and I feel like I have
a heavy weight on my chest. When I am
out, I am squirted with chemicals.
People break into my car and my apartment to replace chemicals, but they
never take anything. They want me to
know they are always present and to have a hopeless feeling, that there is
nothing I can do to avoid being tortured to death and there is nothing I can
do.
Section
III. ***Discuss about how this waiver adversely affected you rights and welfare
as a human subject?***
Personal
privacy is important to ethical research as stated in 45 CFR 46.111, but this
human subject research has not met all of the requirements to protect the human
subjects. My confidentiality and privacy rights have been violated. Invasion
of privacy concerns access to a person's body and the “researchers” and
countless of men, women, and children, also called “informants” or “perps” who
have access to my body 24/7 without my informed consent or knowledge. The
“researchers” have never contacted me about pertinent information after
participation.
I know the handler can hear and see me at all
times. If I say I am going to a
particular store, then I will be met at the store by a gang of stalkers who
will harass me and squirt chemicals on me.
If I read something on the internet having to do with the targeting,
then the chemical or microwave attacks get more intense, like right now. The handler has a chemical to keep me awake
making my heart pound, and one to put me to sleep. Sleep can and is also be induced by
microwaves. About every month or so the
torture increases to a point where it is unbearable, as if they are seeing if
they can kill me or make me call the police.
After a few days of that they back off to a lesser degree of
torture. Also, if I run into a problem, they know what it is, try to
make it worse and also increase the torture to see if I can be broken. My phones are tapped and my cell phone is
manipulated constantly. My computer is
accessed remotely, files are deleted and I have even seen this happen in real
time.
The torture is taking its toll and I feel short of
breath, do not leave the apartment and do not get enough exercise or proper
nutrition. I have no health insurance
and cannot see a doctor when necessary.
I know if I complain too loudly, then I will be put into an
institution. No one will help me nor do
they know anything about this program, even though it has been ongoing for
years. The police and other public
service workers seem to be in on this and even help the
perpetrators out.
_______________________________________________
Section
IV. ***This section is not applicable to me***
___________________________________________
Both
the National Commission for the
Protection of Human Subjects and the President's Commission for the Study of
Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research recommended that such waivers be
granted only if subjects will not be denied benefits or services to which they
are otherwise legally entitled. The waiver of informed consent has diminished
the protection of my rights and welfare as a non-consensual human subject. I
have received no respect as a non-consensual human subject. There is a
non-verbal element that “whatever happens to the human subject is of no
personal concern to the researcher. They can do whatever they want to the human
subject and there is nothing that the human subject can do about because no one
will help the human subject.”
For
research involving more than minimal risk, an explanation as to whether any
compensation and an explanation as to whether any medical treatments are
availability of medical treatment and compensation in the case of
research-related injury, including who will pay for the treatment and the
availability of other financial compensation as stated in 45 CFR 46.116(a)(6).
In July 2005 the National Academy of Sciences came to the conclusion that the
preponderance of scientific evidence shows that even very low doses of
radiation pose a risk of cancer or other health problem and there is no
threshold below, which exposure can be viewed as harmless. According to data
from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, show that symptoms may persist for up to 10
years and may also have an increased long-term risk for leukemia and lymphoma. The effects of radiation on the human
body can be found at www.atomicarchive.com/Effects/radeffects.shtml. Will
the human subjects of this non-consensual human subject research be compensated
due to research-related injury?
The
waiver of informed consent has caused adverse consequences for my welfare and
for my general well-being, as well as, my loved ones. In addition, our rights,
safety, dignity, welfare, and privacy as non-consensual human subjects have
been violated. This human subject research/experiment has also failed to comply
with the terms of the policy, 45 CFR 46 therefore, as stated in 45 CFR 46.123
it should be subject to termination or suspension. If I continue in this
“loosely controlled” research/experiment, it will likely result in irreversible
permanent injury, radiation-induced diseases or even pre-mature death for
myself (this request also includes my family members who were systematically
included in this because of me), because the “researchers” are operating above the
law and below the accepted standard of scientific, ethical, and humane
research. I am requesting to “opt-out” or
discontinue my participation immediately out of this non-consensual human
subject research/experiment without prejudice. The “Common Rule”, 45
CFR 46.116 (a) (8) states, “and the subject may discontinue
participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the
subject is otherwise entitled.” I am not waiving any legal
claims, rights or remedies because of my participation as a non-consensual
human subject. The legal rights as a human subject may not be waived and the
human subject may not be asked to release or appear to release the
investigator, the sponsor, the institution or its agents from liability for
negligence.
Section
V. Revise this area base as an individual or as a family by changing the tenses
I, _James F. Lico____
certify that my decision to “opt-out” or discontinue participation in this
human experiment is without the intervention of any element of force, fraud,
deceit, duress, coercion or undue influence on my decision. I am requesting to
“opt-out” or discontinue my participation because of my rights as a human
subject as stated in 45 CFR 46 116 (a) (8). This request includes all of my
immediate family members who were thrust in this unethical, human subject
research/experiment without their consent or without their knowledge. I/We have
endured grave civil, constitutional & human rights abuses. We have suffered
unimaginable pain & suffering, which is needless & senseless. Our
rights, safety, dignity, welfare, and privacy as a non-consensual human
subject(s) have been violated. This human subject research/experiment has also
failed to comply
with the terms of the policy, 45 CFR 46 therefore, as stated in
45 CFR 46.123 it should be subject to termination or suspension.
No comments:
Post a Comment